Righthaven defendant wins second attorney’s fee award – VEGAS INC

http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/aug/15/righthaven-defendant-wins-second-attorneys-fee-awa/

Righthaven defendant wins second attorney’s fee award

From the page: “In yet another stunning reversal for Las Vegas copyright lawsuit filer Righthaven LLC, the company won’t be collecting any damages from a man it once branded as a copyright infringer.

Instead, it’s Righthaven that must pay the man’s legal fees of $34,045.

U.S. District Judge Philip Pro awarded the fees Monday in the case of Kentucky message board poster Wayne Hoehn.

Pro on June 20 dismissed Righthaven’s lawsuit against Hoehn, finding Righthaven didn’t have standing to sue him and even if it did, Hoehn was protected by the fair use doctrine in posting an entire Las Vegas Review-Journal column on a sports betting website message board. Righthaven’s lack of standing was due to the R-J maintaining control of the column despite Righthaven’s claims of ownership.

Righthaven is appealing the dismissal. But Pro, in the meantime, on Monday ordered Righthaven by Sept. 14 to pay Hoehn’s fees and costs for his representation by Randazza Legal Group of Las Vegas.

Pro, in a short order, rejected arguments by Righthaven that since he dismissed the case he didn’t have jurisdiction in the lawsuit to award fees to anyone.

Hoehn’s attorneys called that argument “bizarre” since Pro’s ruling covered the merits of Righthaven’s lawsuit, not jurisdictional issues.

Pro on Monday noted both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the federal Copyright Act permit the recovery of attorney’s fees and costs for a prevailing party.

“In this case, the court finds that defendant Hoehn is the prevailing party and the attorney’s fees and costs sought on his behalf are reasonable and supported by defendant’s Memorandum of Law,” Pro wrote in his order.

This is the second attorney’s fee award against Righthaven. Earlier, Randazza Legal Group was awarded $3,815 for representing defendant Michael Leon.

But these are likely just the tip of the iceberg, with several cases dismissed based on Righthaven’s lack of standing and more dismissals likely…”

Advertisements
This entry was posted in stumbleupon. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s